User talk:Psylocke/Archive B

This is an archive of all past discussions on my talk page. Do not edit the contents of this page, except for maintenance such as updating links. If you wish to leave me a message, please post on my talk page. Thanks!

Archives Jul 2012 - Oct 2012 Nov 2012 - Dec 2012 Cookie Jar! Impressive ImagesEdit You have been given a cookie! Your dedication and diligence to the wiki has not gone unnoticed. A user has seen the progress you've made, and has given you a cookie because of it. Good work! The user had the following to say: I'm not sure how you manage to get shots such as this and this, but the least you deserve is a cookie for your constant stream of high-quality images. Nice work! —Legoless (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2012 (GMT) Thanks for the cookie Legoless! Console commands work wonders; you can practically do anything. Photoshop works wonders too :3 ~ Psylocke 16:22, 3 November 2012 (GMT) Honeycomb :DEdit Thank you so much for your kindness, Psylocke! :D Your image is beautiful! I truly appreciate your effort! Divines bless your kind heart! Audrey Gally talk 18:53, 8 November 2012 (GMT) Thanks Audrey. My specialty on the wiki seems to be—but not limited to—taking nice screenshots. And I noticed that you have put up more image requests; I'm on it :) ~ Psylocke 03:22, 9 November 2012 (GMT) Thank you so much, Psylocke! wonderful images, I already used the Hawk Beak and Hawk Feathers in their respective pages, BEAUTIFUL!! :D About the Wisp Wrappings: I really thought they were bigger, and now I see that -compared with the giant's toe and nirnroot- they're very tiny! It's a very good image, I just feel the ninroot and the giant's toe distract from the wisp wrappings. I was thinking that maybe cropping the picture would help. If you like, I can do that, I use gimp. I can even erase the ninroot (or maybe I leave it, so the picture has more colors). What do you think? Audrey Gally talk 01:14, 10 November 2012 (GMT) Nah, you don't need to; I can simply go back and snap a screenshot of a slightly closer shot. And yes, the wrappings are small. ~ Psylocke 04:04, 10 November 2012 (GMT) ACK! I didn't see you already uploaded the closer look! I wanted to upload the one I edited so you could see it, but I uploaded the wrong one, HAHAHAHA! XD Then, I'll use the closer look! Thank you so much Psylocke! I'm going to delete the other one XD XD Audrey Gally talk 04:17, 10 November 2012 (GMT) There's no need to delete anything; the file can simply be reverted to the previous version. I just did that for you. ~ Psylocke 05:13, 10 November 2012 (GMT) Thank you very much! XD XD Now it's excellent!! :D Audrey Gally talk 05:40, 10 November 2012 (GMT) Bee & BarbEdit Hi. Does your recent edit summary hint that you might like to perform some surgery on that page? I think it would benefit, personally--JR (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2012 (GMT) Hmm... at that time I was actually considering to revamp the page, since it doesn't follow our style guide. But I don't think I'm a qualified surgeon haha xD and I believe changing the page would take quite some time too. Maybe some other time when I'm in a more revamping mood xD ~ Psylocke 01:49, 14 November 2012 (GMT) Haha. Ok. I think it could use it, and I think you'd do a good job. That's all. --JR (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2012 (GMT) Looking around a bit, inn place pages are all over the ... Place. Bannered Mare, Vilemyr Inn, Nightgate Inn. Such inn-consistency! How lo g can you tolerate it? --JR (talk) 02:40, 14 November 2012 (GMT) Hmmm... I just browsed through a number of the inn articles, and they are indeed not standardised, especially those residents section. Ahh.. this is.. tempting... I'll see what I can do.. some day... :P ~ Psylocke 12:22, 14 November 2012 (GMT) Image on Imperial Soldier ArticleEdit Hi. This may seem like a bit of a joke coming from one of the worst screenshotographers to one of the best, but do you think the image looks a bit dark on that article? If so, I guessed that you might prefer to take another one, unless there's some reason it's better or as good as an alternative. I wouldn't mind trying to replace it, but my chances of taking good shots seems to be less than 50%. So let me know what you think, first. --JR (talk) 17:07, 22 November 2012 (GMT) No sweat. I keep all my original screenshots. ~ Psylocke 17:16, 22 November 2012 (GMT) That was correct?Edit Really? I've have my edits altered like a dozen times cause I wasn't putting punctuation into my captions... weird. Well thanks for fixing that. I need to go fix some of my older edits that got undo from me adding punctuation. Lord Eydvar Talk|Contribs 07:36, 23 November 2012 (GMT) Well, I've seen plenty of patrollers/admins removing full stops from image captions. I'm just following their conventions. ~ Psylocke 07:41, 23 November 2012 (GMT) Ok must've changed the format rules at some point cause I always got fixed if I forgot em. Lord Eydvar Talk|Contribs 07:42, 23 November 2012 (GMT) If it's a sentence, use normal punctuation rules (such as when using dialogue lines for a caption). If it's not a sentence (e.g., "Aela the Huntress" or "Falmer wielding a staff") punctuation is not needed. — ABCface◥ 15:55, 23 November 2012 (GMT) ABCF, is this specified somewhere? If not, I think we should add it, since there seems to be so much confusion about end punctuation of captions. It seems to me that we could appropriately just add it under both "widely-held English standard" and "follows Wikipedia". Maybe mentioning it on CP to give people a chance to object? I'm not giving you a job. I could do it. But what do you (and anyone else reading this) think? --JR (talk) 06:05, 26 November 2012 (GMT) I'm not ABC, but I think this might answer your question.--Br3admax (talk) 06:15, 26 November 2012 (GMT) (←) Thanks for that discussion link, Br3admax. :) I can't find anything else specifically about captions in particular, but there are multiple lines on project pages which say things along the lines of "unless noted otherwise, follow normal grammar rules"... which in this case would still mean full sentences need punctuation, while captions such as "Aela the Huntress" wouldn't. I do think this should be noted somewhere though, maybe on the Help:Images page? — ABCface◥ 06:35, 26 November 2012 (GMT) Most of our image captions are either short descriptions (which aren't complete sentences, like the examples you gave), or direct quotes from an NPC (which are sentences with punctuations within quotation marks). And yes, that's a good idea ABC. I suggest expanding the last paragraph of Help:Images#Thumbnails, since that part says "It is generally recommended that you provide a description of your image etc etc..." ~ Psylocke 11:08, 26 November 2012 (GMT) Alfwyn is wrongEdit Considering there is no established policy on this wiki as to how headers should be handled, we always defer to Wikipedia (e.g. Manual of Style). Precedent doesn't mean much when the WP MoS is our established policy. So, please revert the incorrect edit to the page that was written by me and stood as such for two years. Thanks. (And before you go quoting pages, make sure they're actually policy and not baseless conversations that are 6 years old.) elliot (talk) 02:57, 26 November 2012 (GMT) Alfwyn and Psylocke are correct in this situation. It may be true that there is no policy article explicitly stating that section headings are to be capitalized as titles, but it's always been done on all other articles before, and that's plenty precedent to constitute consensus even without the discussions Psylocke brought up. That no one changed it before was probably because it's not a frequently visited page, and most people have focused their attention on game namespaces until now. ⇠eshetalk 03:06, 26 November 2012 (GMT) Doing something wrong over and over doesn't make it right or the best way to actually do it. Capitalizing every word in the heading is like capitalizing every word in a paper's outline. It's 4th grade quality, which is why WP doesn't do it. elliot (talk) 04:44, 26 November 2012 (GMT) Regardless, we are not Wikipedia, and we have always capitalized headers on our articles. If you would like to propose a change to current practice, please feel free to bring it up on the Community Portal or on the appropriate policy or guideline page. Thanks! ⇠eshetalk 14:21, 26 November 2012 (GMT) I was going to suggest the same thing to you, since you a breaking the MoS that is linked to on policy page. elliot (talk) 22:34, 26 November 2012 (GMT) (←) First, I think that elliot has taken a disrespectful and unnecessarily provocative tone above, and the behavior is a bit hurtful to me as a reader. I think I know better than to argue that it's violating a policy or etc., but I do wish to share those thoughts and feelings. I personally request that opinions be asserted without calling others "wrong" when there is no practical benefit that I can see in doing so, and that we refrain from using language that can easily be interpreted as condescending, likely to "shut someone down", or likely to feel like an attack and begin or escalate a counter-productive conflict. That said, my reading of current policy is that it is at best ambiguous on this issue, and tends to tilt toward capitalizing "titles and subtitles" and "headings" on the wiki, except for headings on talk pages, which are to be "writer's option." That comes from UESPWiki:Spelling#General, with some support from this discussion. I have initiated a "capitalization project" here. Please contribute to it. I am working on it because I'm interested in it and I think it's important, but I prefer to have collaborators if possible, rather than developing a full proposal by myself. --JR (talk) 02:52, 28 November 2012 (GMT) Images on Eggs pageEdit Hey Psylocke! I haven't voted on the FA nomination for the Easter Eggs page yet because I'm still unsure of where I stand on it, but when looking at it just now I noticed something that bothered me a little. Some of the images have no captions... since you are the one who uploaded all the images, I figured I'd ask you if this was something intentional and I missed the reason for it, or if it needed to be addressed. I haven't looked at ME's sandbox, the page revision history, or the discussions about it, so if I missed something somewhere I apologize. It's unusual to see images without captions around here, so I was curious if it was intentional or not. — ABCface◥ 03:46, 26 November 2012 (GMT) For my draft, I added a caption for some of the thumbnails, but not the Bleakcoast Cave Star Wars one. No real reason; just nothing to say. A couple other pics were added later without captions. Minor EditsThreats•Evidence 03:50, 26 November 2012 (GMT) ↑What ME said; and yes, I guess it needs to be addressed. When I added those images, I couldn't really coin a good caption. I was thinking of something like "Behold... Excalibur." (lol) or "The Force is strong with this one." (lol, again :P), but I guess those quotes sounds a little cheesy and just don't fit. Well, if you can think of any good captions, feel free to add them! :) ~ Psylocke 11:08, 26 November 2012 (GMT) C is for Cookie that's good enough for me!Edit You have been given a cookie! Your dedication and diligence to the wiki has not gone unnoticed. A user has seen the progress you've made, and has given you a cookie because of it. Good work! The user had the following to say: Yays for lots of works! Lord Eydvar Talk|Contribs 08:29, 28 November 2012 (GMT) Thanks Eydvar, I appreciate it! Yums cookie :3 ~ Psylocke 08:32, 28 November 2012 (GMT) Thanks; UnboundEdit Thanks for this. If you have time, would you mind giving me some feedback on what I've done so far? I've gotten some from Krusty already, but could use some more, and could REALLY use some help with the layout. I have neither the eye for nice layouts, nor the code knowledge for it. If you have the time, you can ignore the--or most of the--invisitext stuff on the page, and you can edit the sandbox directly. If I can get it into "good enough" shape, I will go ahead and replace the page with this part (up to entering the keep), then finish revamping the rest. --JR (talk) 07:02, 6 December 2012 (GMT) No biggy; I just noticed that the template had redlinks. And sure, I'll read through your sandbox when I got the time, and I'll see if I can come up with some nice layout. ~ Psylocke 07:07, 6 December 2012 (GMT) Tree StoneEdit I doubt it's called tree stone, I also doubt that the wording of the spell is what is written on that page, but I haven't gotten far enough in the main quest to check. I'll add it when I do. Also, the Tree Stone doesn't have a map marker, it is located at the Temple of Miraak, so it probably shouldn't have its own location page. Jeancey (talk) 06:32, 7 December 2012 (GMT) Okay, thanks. Being a PC user, there's nothing much for me to do except to wait for data, then organize the data on the site. Guess I'll just wait for more info from xbox users. And keep up the good work! ~ Psylocke 06:37, 7 December 2012 (GMT) Removing |mod= parameterEdit Hey, since you're doing that, care to formally add your input regarding it here so we can get some formal consensus? — ABCface◥ 07:14, 7 December 2012 (GMT) Sure, I'll go ahead and add my two cents at the portal. ~ Psylocke 07:32, 7 December 2012 (GMT) New QuestionEdit I ran across Opusculus Lamae Bal in DB, and I didn't recall ever seeing it before so I looked it up. From what I can tell, it was added to Skyrim with Dawnguard, but I've never installed Dawnguard. Was it really added with Dawnguard? Or did I just miss it somehow while playing Skyrim proper? If it was added with Dawnguard, what does that mean if I found it without having Dawnguard installed? Thanks in advance! Jeancey (talk) 07:24, 7 December 2012 (GMT) Yes, it is in DG. My guess is: if you have DG, the book in Valerica's study is available to you. If you have DB but not DG, only the one added by DB is available to you. If you have both plug-ins, most probably both can be obtained. ~ Psylocke 07:32, 7 December 2012 (GMT) So should it be added to the DB namespace because it's possible that you can have it in DB but NOT in Skyrim proper? Jeancey (talk) 07:38, 7 December 2012 (GMT) It was actually present in the original version of the game. It's part of the "List 3" and the types are explained here. — ABCface◥ 07:39, 7 December 2012 (GMT) Oh, I must have just missed it then. Ok, thanks! Jeancey (talk) 07:41, 7 December 2012 (GMT) Ignite and FreezeEdit I've shut down the xbox for the night, so I can't check, but it's possible that Ignite and Freeze are powers, not actually spells. The Visage of Mzund gives a spell-like power when equipped and it is possible that the exact same mechanic is happening with the ring. I remember equipping it, and seeing the "Ignite added" "Freeze added" pop up, but I took the ring off pretty quick without actually trying out the spells. I'll check tomorrow morning though (in about 5 hours or so). Jeancey (talk) 11:26, 7 December 2012 (GMT) Okay, no problem, I'll just wait for confirmation. I can easily make the changes if those turn out to be powers. ~ Psylocke 11:28, 7 December 2012 (GMT) When I was adding races, genders and locations to NPC articles, I noticed a few categories that were red-linked. In case you were looking for something to do :P I have no idea what is needed to make them not red-linked anymore. The only one I remember specifically was Category:Dragonborn-Child, but I know I saw a page with 2 of them at some point. I went through pretty much every NPC in the NPC category, so I really have no idea which one it was. Jeancey (talk) 11:31, 7 December 2012 (GMT) Just as an update, it looks like they are, in fact, destruction spells. :) Jeancey (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2012 (GMT) BenkongerikeEdit I was wondering about the type of Benkongerike. On the map, it is a cave, and the first zone is a cave, but the second zone is entirely a nordic ruin, with no cave aspects at all, and the first zone (the cave part) is littered with burial urns, and other nordic ruin materials. So should it be classified as a cave? Or a nordic ruin? Jeancey (talk) 18:23, 7 December 2012 (GMT) I have no clue. Since its marker ID is a cave, I simply marked it as a cave, for now. I don't know about its insides. If you think otherwise, go ahead and change it. If someone else changes it back, simply bring it to its talk page and discuss. ~ Psylocke 18:29, 7 December 2012 (GMT) Tel Mithryn PeopleEdit How would I deal with the fact that the main Tel Mithryn Tower is just called the same as the entire place? Should I put the residents on the main Tel Mithryn page? Or make a new, separate page? Jeancey (talk) 07:47, 9 December 2012 (GMT) Hmmm.. I don't know the layout of the place. I think just put it on the same page instead of making a new one, for now. If a new page is needed in the future, my guess is there may be a need for a disambiguation page. ~ Psylocke 07:52, 9 December 2012 (GMT) Delphine article introEdit Thanks for fixing up the looks of my reshuffelin! :) To my embarrassment I forgot... CapnZapp (talk) 16:13, 9 December 2012 (GMT) No problem. I wrote the entire article, so I feel responsible for maintaining it :) ~ Psylocke 16:15, 9 December 2012 (GMT) Patroller?Edit Hey, I haven't been active for a while, but I think it's high time to ask: Would you be opposed if I nominated you to be a Patroller? It's been a long time coming, and I think you would be a good fit. ThuumofReason (talk) 20:10, 9 December 2012 (GMT) Hi, and thanks for considering me for nomination, but I think I'll pass, for now. Even if I become one, I will be simply editing away and not patrolling much. I may reconsider some time in the future, maybe :) ~ Psylocke 22:22, 9 December 2012 (GMT) Okay. Just thought I'd put it to you, but we definitely don't need administrative duties interfering with your awesome editing. ThuumofReason (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2012 (GMT) Swift as a sword cutEdit [1] Thanks for the quick fix, Psylocke! --Arkhon (talk) 04:50, 10 December 2012 (GMT) You're welcome! I just happened to be around :) ~ Psylocke 05:01, 10 December 2012 (GMT) Dragon text capitalizationEdit How do you know when to capitalize things in dragon text transliterations? Jeancey (talk) 07:32, 10 December 2012 (GMT) 9 letters of the Dragon Alphabet constitute pairs of letters. Lower-case letters on the transliterations indicate these pairs. Minor EditsThreats•Evidence 07:39, 10 December 2012 (GMT) Thank YouEdit I actually ran the bot to make sure it was getting the parentheses properly, and as you noticed, I goofed. Thanks for fixing them! – Robin Hood↝talk 08:06, 11 December 2012 (GMT) Hee :3 You're welcome. ~ Psylocke 08:15, 11 December 2012 (GMT) Loot on pagesEdit Having loot on the page is fine. I removed it mainly because it was detailing non notable loot (wheels of cheese and wine) and a single leveled chest, when there were at least 6 such chests scattered throughout the dungeon. I just didn't think THAT chest (along with the junk) needed to be mentioned, but I can understand keeping it in. Jeancey (talk) 18:52, 11 December 2012 (GMT) For now, DB pages are still stubs, but once they are expanded, with all the zones and walkthroughs (some examples of military forts), we usually include the loot available, in order to refrain from including them on quest pages etc. ~ Psylocke 18:59, 11 December 2012 (GMT) Hey Miraak is actually LightEdit Hey Psylocke I've got miraak in my game on my 360 and it is indeed a light armor mask. Might be listed wrong somewhere in game data but in game it is light armor. Lord Eydvar Talk|Contribs 06:25, 12 December 2012 (GMT) According to Alfwyn in this discussion, there are six versions of the mask named "Miraak": three light armor ones and three heavy armor ones. It's possible that the one the player gets is radiant. — ABCface◥ 06:31, 12 December 2012 (GMT) Makes sense I'm a light armor char so my LA skill was a lot higher then my HA. I'm going to go change that on the table to be a ? for now. Lord Eydvar Talk|Contribs 06:36, 12 December 2012 (GMT) Cookie!Edit You have been given a cookie! Your dedication and diligence to the wiki has not gone unnoticed. A user has seen the progress you've made, and has given you a cookie because of it. Good work! The user had the following to say: You deserve a treat for your huge effort taking snapshots of dead bodies - awesome work!!--Krusty (talk) 13:53, 12 December 2012 (GMT) Hee :3 Thanks for the cookie Krusty! ~ Psylocke 13:59, 12 December 2012 (GMT) Category SortingEdit Hiya Psylocke! Thanks for keeping an eye on all the Dragonborn stuff :). I just wanted to let you know that the categories don't know the difference between [[Category:Dragonborn-Places|Towns]] and [[Category:Dragonborn-Places| Towns]]—the category will sort just fine either way. (As an example, the subcategories in Category:Skyrim-Places don't have a space before the sort name, and Skyrim-Places is correctly sorted.) Anyway, not a big deal, just thought it might save you some time ;). Thanks again! ⇠eshetalk 14:36, 12 December 2012 (GMT) Hmm.. I think you misinterpreted what I—or rather, ABCface and I—are trying to achieve. Actually, at first, I created DB categories like how you would; but then, ABCface started adding the spaces to those categories to standardise sorting, and I followed her lead. From what I recall in a previous discussion, she told me that by putting a space before the sortkey, all the categories will be "sorted" at the top, so that the categories won't be split into two groups (or more). ~ Psylocke 14:48, 12 December 2012 (GMT) I guess I don't follow :P. I've never seen spaces (at least consistently) put in category sortkeys before, and I've never seen a category have issues sorting things correctly without a space. Do you have an example maybe of what you mean to avoid? ⇠eshetalk 14:58, 12 December 2012 (GMT) (edit conflict) This sorting issue was touched on in an older discussion before, and I actually intend to eventually change the Skyrim ones to be the same way as we are changing the Dragonborn ones now. The first time this was brought up was before the wiki upgrade, and the issues that have (re-)arisen since the upgrade only make me feel that way even more. As noted on some of the category talk pages, the "next 200" links not working is something that has happened in the past (years ago, and I know it's only a temporary issue, but all the same, if it's happened more than once already, it will probably happen again even after we finally get it fixed this time). With categories which are small, the sorting of subcategories isn't as much of an issue, but for larger categories it's much more convenient to have them all grouped together at the top. And for consistency, I've been keeping most of them this way, even if they are small. Also, feel free to ask me to clarify any of this at any point because I didn't get much sleep, have only just woken up, and I'm not entirely awake yet. :P — ABCface◥ 15:02, 12 December 2012 (GMT) Ah, thanks for the links, ABCface! I get what you're saying now :). The problem with this method is that it removes the the letter headers from the list of subcategories. For pages with few subcategories, this isn't a big deal, but on pages such as Category:Skyrim-Places, it's definitely easier to navigate the list with the letter headers in place. I also personally dislike the "cont." header that shows up (on Category:Dragonborn-Places for example) with no letter before it. When it's "C cont." that makes sense, but "<nothing> cont." looks odd to me. In any case, like I said, on pages with short lists of subcategories it's not that difficult to read the list with no letter headers, but where do we draw the line? I personally think it would be easier to just leave the old sorting in place, so nobody has to quibble over whether or not a category has enough subcategories to warrant letter headers or not, but I suppose it could be worth exploring. ⇠eshetalk 15:27, 12 December 2012 (GMT) Well, I've been digging through various category pages and going back over the situation from the last discussion about this, and it seems that the wiki upgrade a few months ago actually resolved the issue which held significance here before. At the time of the first discussion I linked above, there were situations when you had to click the "next 200" link on a category page to see more subcategories even when there were only four or five subcategories total. This isn't the case anymore. Since the previous reasoning for sorting all subcategories with spaces is no longer an issue, I'm going to go ahead and update all the Dragonborn categories to follow the same sorting method as what's used most other places on the site. After getting the Dragonborn categories taken care of, I'll try to sort through the Skyrim categories which are inconsistent and standardize those as well. — ABCface◥ 00:44, 13 December 2012 (GMT) (←) Okay, all the Dragonborn categories should be updated to follow the category sorting method Eshe recommended at this point. I'm going to look into the Skyrim categories later, and make those consistent next. I just realized that Category:Oblivion-Places is using spaces to sort, but Category:Morrowind-Places isn't, so we actually aren't really consistent about this. Maybe I'll look into all of them over time, sometimes it's fun to go into bot mode. :P — ABCface◥ 01:57, 13 December 2012 (GMT) Alvor's house, etcEdit There is a big difference, in my opinion, between those that are inside of major cities (ie, are using the city template) and those that are in an open town. These towns don't always have these different things (forge, workbench, etc) and the info box of the smaller towns isn't overly full (or full really at all). I think that they should be moved to the town instead of the houses, also because there are several of them that can't realistically be included in any of the individual house pages. That was my reasoning anyway. Does that make sense? Jeancey (talk) 13:53, 13 December 2012 (GMT) I do not see any benefit in moving all the special features to the town infobox. Readers looking at the town info would not know where to find these features. Just because those forges, tanning racks etc are not within the interior cell of the house doesn't mean they are not part of that building. Also, these features are just outside the house (e.g., on the porches). Furthermore, articles such as Skyrim:Tanning, Skyrim:Forge, Skyrim:Grindstone, and Skyrim:Workbench lists these features at the respective houses/stores. Also, other than the 3 examples I gave you when I did the undo, there are more infoboxes which include the features. ~ Psylocke 14:04, 13 December 2012 (GMT) Just to add on, a short infobox doesn't mean they're incomplete. I have seen a lot of very short infoboxes (with only region, location, and respawn time) and they are completely fine. There is no need to force in information when those information are already documented on other separate pages. ~ Psylocke 14:16, 13 December 2012 (GMT) SkyrimEdit Hey, sorry just a quick question, where did you get your copy of Skyrim? And just checking that it's on PC? Cheezytrousers (talk) 07:44, 17 December 2012 (GMT) Yes, I'm a PC user - always haven been, always will be :) As for my Skyrim game, my boyfriend got it for me; not really sure where it's from. Most probably some random gaming shop. ~ Psylocke 07:57, 17 December 2012 (GMT) I'm thinking of getting a PC version of the game because apparently it's heaps better than the PS3 version. That way I will be able to be a dragon and take screenshots! You can't do that on PS3! I just dont have the money right now though, as I've paid for heaps of christmas presents. Anyways i'll get it soon enough. Thanks anyway. Cheezytrousers (talk) 08:01, 17 December 2012 (GMT) ThanksEdit Thanks for this fix. Asleep at the wheel. :) – Robin Hood↝talk 23:16, 17 December 2012 (GMT) You're welcome :3 ~ Psylocke 07:31, 18 December 2012 (GMT) Class detailsEdit About class details, there was a bit of discussion here. --Alfwyn (talk) 18:20, 21 December 2012 (GMT) Calling out Footnotes/Referring to intrapage detailsEdit Hi. Somewhere not too long ago, you used some code to correct a problem with a † symbol linking to the wrong place, or something like that. Can you remind me what the page was, if you remember, or point me somewhere where I can learn the wikimarkup code for doing this? By this, I mean "calling out footnotes", commonly done with <sup>†</sup> around the wiki. --JR (talk) 08:22, 31 December 2012 (GMT) You're referring to this? Markups used are {{note}} and {{intnote}}. ~ Psylocke 10:59, 31 December 2012 (GMT) Yes. I guess I thanked you somewhere else, otherwise I forgot. Thanks. On this, I'm sure you're right, because I didn't know what I was talking about. And still don't. I know nothing about Hearthfire. And on that topic, I hope everyone is feeling free to correct or change a lot of my writing. I'm actually purposefully avoiding trying to figure out what's right or best on certain things right now, so I'm probably producing a lot of inconsistency. I appreciate any effort to improve it, even on issues that are or may be more or less up in the air. --JR (talk) 17:06, 5 January 2013 (GMT) You're welcome. About the bug, I have no clue about it as well xD. I simply noticed that the page was about "sawn logs" and the bug was about "firewood". I was kinda wondering why on earth he would sell firewood (since it's usually the other way round), so I made the change :) ~ Psylocke 17:12, 5 January 2013 (GMT) The funniest part is that I remember thinking at the time, "Wow. I believe I figured that out." And I was proud of myself! --JR (talk) 00:28, 6 January 2013 (GMT)