User talk:173.65.88.91

The PurificationEdit

Please stop adding that note to that page. While you are correct that it is possible to revive them with the console, it is possible to do plenty of things with the console, such as creating an army of clones of Martin Septim. There simply isn't reason to list every possible trick you can do with the console without good reason, and your reasoning that access to wares or the dark gift isn't good enough. --AKB ^{Talk Cont Mail} 07:19, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean "Not good enough"? It allows the completion of a quest as well as access to a unique set of spells in the game. I'll need some expounding beyond "Not good enough." 173.65.88.91 07:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

What exactly is special about this note? You can revive virtually any NPC in the game to gain access to things you shouldn't have access to anymore. More importantly, you can simply buy the spells or get the dark gift before killing them (In fact we already mention this). There simply isn't a point in listing everything you can do with the console, this tip falls firmly in the field of things that you can do with the console we don't need to bother listing. --AKB ^{Talk Cont Mail} 07:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Sure took your time putting it back over here. It's special because it's a unique situation in the game, and a way to work around the need to kill the Dark Brotherhood people. I am not listing out every little thing you can do with the console, I am giving a fix for a problem stated on the page. Before you say that it's obvious, remember that you're dealing with humans and they don't think of these things. It doesn't detract from the page at all either. 173.65.88.91 07:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

The problem with your logic is simple, the murder of the Dark Brotherhood comrades is intended, therefore you aren't fixing anything. It isn't being added back, not just because it isn't wanted (And it isn't), but because so far four editors have explained why we don't want this. --AKB ^{Talk Cont Mail} 07:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

And allow me to be the fifth. The biggest problem with your logic is that we'd have to add this to all pages where a situation of this type occurs. Killing any merchant with a unique item or spell and then reanimating them is not unique. It happens to me multiple times every game. Once we add it to one page we have to add it to the rest. A lot of work for relatively small gain.--Kalis Agea^{Yes? Contrib E-mail} 07:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Edit WarringEdit

Please stop edit warring on Oblivion:The Purification and Oblivion:Letter Home. You've been given reasons why your additions aren't correct for those pages, and if you want to discuss them further please use the articles' talk pages instead of reverting other editors. If you keep edit warring you'll be blocked for disruptive editing. rpeh •T•C•E• 07:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

How is editing "Letter Home" once edit warring? — Unsigned comment by 173.65.88.91 (talk) at 08:05 on 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Make that three times (Here, here, and here). While you only re-added that note once after it was removed it still counts as an example once you take into consideration the much bigger example of The Purification. --AKB ^{Talk Cont Mail} 08:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Exactly. It shows an inclination to argue using the Undo button rather than the talk page, so I mentioned it. rpeh •T•C•E• 08:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Considering that they doen't very often go to the talk page to discuss my edits, I think it's appropriate I respond in kind. When you are argumentative, you get argumentative back. Perhaps if it was suggested more politely it wouldn't have provoked a response. Alas, I tire of this fascism. I would return to my normal fixing of typos you people leave around on your site, but now, I'm rather disinclined to do so. Scratch that. English is more important than petty squabbles. Still. Be polite and you'll get more polite responses. Right now I'm quite a bit too high on a consummation of sorts to care. Au revoir. 173.65.88.91 10:32, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Nobody has been argumentative or impolite, and none of it has any remote connection to fascism. You are the one edit warring against several other editors, so the onus is on you to state your reasons if you feel the reasons given by more experienced editors in their edit summaries are insufficient. rpeh •T•C•E• 13:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

(←) This seems like a misunderstanding; perhaps you don't fully understand the process used on UESPWiki. The way this wiki works is 1: Be bold. Make your edit. 2: Undo. If you don't like someone's edit, be bold and undo it. 3: Discuss. If someone undid your edit and you think it shouldn't have been undone, discuss it on the talk page. No one was being rude, and the burden of "proof" that your edit should have remained is on you. I hope that this doesn't stop you from continuing to edit, and possibly even helps you to more fully understand the process we use. --GK^talk2me 14:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Well that makes more sense. I suppose I might even make an account sometime then, if that's how it works. 173.65.88.91 06:35, 14 July 2011 (UTC)