User talk:Rpeh

2,086 bytes added, 18:53, 21 April 2012
Blocked: reply
: Please specify the alleged "personal attacks" and "multiple disruptions", and please highlight the warnings given about them. [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]]<span style="font-size:xx-small">&nbsp;•[[User_Talk:Rpeh|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Rpeh|C]]•[[Special:Emailuser/Rpeh|E]]•</span> 17:46, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
::I would first like to start off by saying that no formal warning has been given about this. However, as UESP [[UESPWiki:Blocking Policy|Blocking Policy]] states: ''"Although this three-step process [Warn, Temporary Block, Permanent Block] is the normal procedure, administrators have the authority to bypass one or more steps at their discretion."'' The policy page goes onto include personal attacks as a reason to not just bypass a warning, but can be grounds for an immediate permanent block. I made note to remove any mention of a warning from this block due to this.
::As for your request for examples, you have [ claimed that Daveh is sycophant and incompetent], [ left a sarcastic reply to a user during a previous request to have you blocked], [ claimed that RH70 was sucking up to other users] (according to [ Wikipedia Policy], accusing a user of a certain kind of behavior without evidence to back it up is considered a personal attack), and you were disruptive when a user's eligibility in a discussion was called into question due to perceived signs of meat puppetry [ here] and [ here].
::I apologize that I don't have time to go into detail with anything but I'm rather busy IRL at the moment. I may be disposed to reply swiftly to any other message, but I will try to get back to you. --[[User:Alpha Kenny Buddy|AKB]] <sup>[[User_talk:Alpha_Kenny_Buddy|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Alpha Kenny Buddy|Cont]] [[Special:Emailuser/Alpha Kenny Buddy|Mail]]</sup> 18:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)