User talk:Daveh

786 bytes added, 19:57, 6 February 2012
Community Discussion About rpeh: reply
::::What exactly constitutes "disruptive behavior"? Who is it disrupting? To be clear, I voted against de-admining you, but you aren't helping your case. Verbally assaulting a group is not an appropriate way of dealing with content you believe to be stolen, and I would argue it is more disruptive than a petition for your removal under the circumstances. –[[User:SkoomaManiac|SkoomaManiac]] 19:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
:::::Repeatedly re-adding a pointless vote with no chance of passing that's only stirring up bad blood is incredibly disruptive. Being told this and then running off to a different venue to complain about it is even more disruptive. Certainly I had planned to spend this evening on the site, but discovering that a mass of utter nonsense has been vomited over the site and that various malcontents are intent on stirring up trouble has put me right off. Krusty, an uninvolved admin, removed the discussion because it served absolutely no purpose. The editors who put it back should all know better. [[User:Rpeh|rpeh]]<span style="font-size:xx-small">&nbsp;•[[User_Talk:Rpeh|T]]•[[Special:Contributions/Rpeh|C]]•[[Special:Emailuser/Rpeh|E]]•</span> 19:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)