Changes

Lore talk:Padomay

322 bytes added, 22 March
no edit summary
 
: This seems like it's getting a little off topic, though, so I'm gonna try to steer it back to Padomay/Sithis. Personally, I think the answer should lie with two questions: 'Are the names effectively interchangeable' and 'will they lose any vital context for the god if the pages are split?'. In the case of Lorkhaj, no to both, as Lorkhaj is a fully defined diety with a mythos separate, albeit similar, from Lorkhan. For Padomay and Sithis, I would say they are used interchangeably, but lets pretend for a moment they aren't. Even then, separating all the different versions into individual pages takes them out of the context of the Monomyth and also really weakens the information we have available on each of these deities. The Adversary, Fadomai, Padomay, and Akel would all barely have 1 or 2 sources for their pages, and would be at most a paragraph long. It would be way harder for people to have an understanding of Padomay/Sithis as a result of splitting it up into 3 or 4 pages. -- [[User:Jacksol|Jacksol]] ([[User talk:Jacksol|talk]]) 02:32, 5 March 2020 (GMT)
 
:: I believe that when it comes to deities, different cultures have different stories and creation myths. Differences in cultural beliefs should be noted within ONE deities pages and the different names per culture also within that page.[[User:Zebendal|Zebendal]] ([[User talk:Zebendal|talk]]) 00:46, 22 March 2020 (GMT)
6,917
edits