Page history
12 April 2023
11 April 2023
Restoring temporarily until the discussion ends, but it does seem to be heading towards consensus of removal.
+400
doesn't include any UOL
m-33
Consensus seems to be toward removal, and if there isn't consensus, the standard would be to remove it until consensus is reached
-371
→Notes: Rewording
+371
Undo revision 2774965 by Legoless (talk) Based on the above discussion there absolutely was never a consensus reached to include this, it was divided to put it kindly. Hasn’t passed muster
-367
Undo revision 2774792 by Achernar1 (talk) UESPWiki:Lore
+367
Undo revision 2762724 by Legoless (talk) only the answers are real lore. This is a random fan trying to sneak scenarist guild lore into canon
-367
12 March 2023
Undo revision 2762723 by Imperialbattlespire (talk) cited as UOL per talk page consensus
+367
Not acknowledged in answer
-367
19 February 2023
31 January 2023
22 January 2023
6 November 2022
restore
+367
Undo revision 2694866 by Phoenix Neko (talk) consensus is that UOL tag is required for user-written sections
+33
Thankfully, not needed anymore.
-33
1 November 2022
29 September 2022
Undo revision 2686071 by TheRockWithAMedicineCupOnHisHead (talk) per CP consensus on citing LA
+367
Iszara the Restless is a tag coming from a fan question submission, not uol
-367
22 August 2022
19 February 2021
14 February 2021
12 November 2020
4 October 2019
21 October 2018
12 October 2018
11 October 2018
27 September 2018
Undo revision 1850379 by Phoenix Neko (talk) still a matter of discussion in the talk page
+341
1. UOL can't be used as a primary lore source. 2. PLAYERS' NAMES AREN'T LORE! 3. We don't document players' names.
-341
23 September 2018
22 September 2018
21 September 2018
20 September 2018
Partial revert - Lore Link should only be used if the page is transcluded outside of Lore space (or is expected to be in future, like books)
m+71
cleanup and updating refs to template
m-211
Undo revision 1844460 by MortenOSlash (talk) that is not the policy, please see recent CP consensus
+236
Undo revision 1844453 by Rezalon (talk) The policy is that Loremaster Archives Q&A answers are valid sources but the questions and the usernames are not.
-236
Undo revision 1844349 by Phoenix Neko (talk) All relevant lore information, especially lore on obscure things, like this guild, should and must be documented
+236
That's not the point. Why should we document the name of a random player?
-236
Undo revision 1844230 by Phoenix Neko (talk)These Q&As are canon
+236
Is that a lore fact? Why the random player's name is important?
-237