Page history
27 March 2024
Paarthurnax's dialogue was quoted 3 separate times
m-102
→Alduin: I added Paarthurnax's quote of Alduin claiming Akatosh's lordship to show that dragons see the two as distinct. This is kind of an argument against them being aspects of the same god, so feel free to remove it if it seems out of place
+563
→Alkosh
+12
Alkhan for completeness sake, bracketing off the different aspects in different categories because it feels important to note some of these are well established as accepted Akatosh equivalents and others are anything but.
+981
25 March 2024
→Depictions
+66
Added Thartaag and All-Maker for their adjacency to Alduin and thus Akatosh. Added The One for well established ties to Aka
+1,381
22 March 2024
no edit summary
-31
Clean up, added Ruptga to syncretism and removed yokudan deities from opening blurb as they, much like Alduin are much less solid then the well established Auriel and Alkosh ties and are better served in more depth in the lower body of the article.
+478
5 February 2024
24 December 2023
27 October 2023
1 October 2023
28 September 2023
20 September 2023
19 September 2023
13 September 2023
17 August 2023
16 August 2023
→Alduin: typo
m-1
→Alduin: tweak
m+7
Removing toc suppression
m-9
WIP to address recent discussion on talk page
+8,934
14 August 2023
Satakal returned; fix on Alkosh, he was the one split by the spirits of Akha. Not Akha.
m+63
Undo revision 2825828 by The Entity (talk) See Lore talk:Children of the Root for established talk page precedent against conflating these figures.
-234
Undo revision 2825827 by Dcking20 (talk) Controversial edit is yours today, the Satakal addition was in 2022. Atakota is the new addition.
m+234
Undo revision 2825815 by The Entity (talk) Page should be revised to the version before controversial edit pending discussion, not otherwise.
-234
Undo revision 2825806 by Dcking20 (talk) Should speak further on this prior to anymore edits
m+234
So much incorrect information it’s hard to pick a place to start, the easiest ones are Atakota and Satakal are absolutely not an Akatosh equivalent
-234
trying different wording to avoid confusion around "eponymous" or what shield and bow we're talking about. Still not super happy with it.
m+7
Tweaking, source actually specifies Anuiel.
+8
Restoring sentence, while adding vn to it.
+355
Removing speculative sentence. Changing Aniu-El to Anu, to match the source. Putting Atakota with Satakal since earlier versions already cast doubt on Satakal definitely being Akatosh (may need reworking). Rewriting dragon break sentence for clarity.
-527
Corrected who made Auriel's Shield&Bow. Corrected myself by adding less certainty on Imperial view of the Shield and bow. Added Atakota, Satakal parallel, as an Argonian Akatosh name. Added potential Dragon break examples.
+539