Oblivion talk:Nibenay Basin
Regarding Undo RevisionEdit
Re: "09:40, 19 February 2008 HMSVictory (Talk | contribs) (5,611 bytes) (Undo revision 248647 by Laisren (Talk) There is no reason why this information should not be here.) "
I did not remove any information:
- I removed the wording that said "Suprisingly..." because there is no reason that it should be "suprising" (see my comment on the page history).
- I did a minor 'rearranging of the sentences. Please review the changes more closely to see how it was re-arranged. Thanks.
- Laisren 04:20, 23 February 2008 (EST)
- You removed nearly all of the information! I would have agreed with you had you just removed "surprisingly," but when I patrol your edit, nearly all of the article is gone! What where you thinking? The information here is adequete as it is, and needs no major revamping. --HMSVictory 04:56, 23 February 2008 (EST)
-
- Victory, I'm not sure what you mean. All that Laisren did was move the text around a bit - nothing was deleted apart from the word "surprisingly". I originally put that word in because when I was mapping out the regions a few months back I was surprised at just how far east the basin went. I'm not sure I agree with Laisren's point about river basins because in the case most of the Great Forest and West Weald would be part of the basin too, but it was a purely personal reaction and thus doesn't belong on the article. –Rpeh•T•C•E• 10:03, 23 February 2008 (EST)
- What? When I check over his edit, all I could see on the "Current Revison" section was green space! There was no information left save the short introductory paragraph. I assumed that Larisen had decided that the information was irrelevent, which, of course, it wasn't, and had deleted it all. So Larisen did a little more than "move the text around a bit" - he had removed most of the article's information! I can't see what was wrong with the information as it was, so I reverted the edit, guessing that what was there must be better than nothing at all! --HMSVictory 10:34, 23 February 2008 (EST)
- Victory, I'm not sure what you mean. All that Laisren did was move the text around a bit - nothing was deleted apart from the word "surprisingly". I originally put that word in because when I was mapping out the regions a few months back I was surprised at just how far east the basin went. I'm not sure I agree with Laisren's point about river basins because in the case most of the Great Forest and West Weald would be part of the basin too, but it was a purely personal reaction and thus doesn't belong on the article. –Rpeh•T•C•E• 10:03, 23 February 2008 (EST)
-
-
-
-
- Oh crap... SORRY! --HMSVictory 14:04, 23 February 2008 (EST)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- No worries, mate. Happens to the best of us :-) (That's all I was trying to say about the 'look more closely' part...) --Laisren 02:26, 24 February 2008 (EST)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- I think I should stay away from the Recent Changes page for a while. --HMSVictory 10:06, 24 February 2008 (EST)
-
-
-
-
-
basin=lowlandsEdit
As the word is 'basin' the shaded area should not extend so far north, as it overlaps with the highlands around cheydinhal, where the rise of the land is dramatic. — Unsigned comment by Temple-Zero (talk • contribs)