Page history
14 December 2016
5 September 2014
10 March 2013
→You must know by now.: Reply
+634
uns
m+39
→You must know by now.
+122
→You must know by now.: reply
m+389
uns, indent
m+42
→You must know by now.
+369
→You must know by now.: My thoughts
+1,009
→You must know by now.: input
+914
→You must know by now.: Input
+661
uns
m+41
→You must know by now.
+406
uns, reply, discussion over
+297
→You must know by now.
+1,129
→You must know by now.
+152
→You must know by now.: reply uns
+799
→You must know by now.
+903
uns reply
+553
no edit summary
+529
reply, uns
+341
→You must know by now.
+94
9 March 2013
→You must know by now.: chronological order
m+42
→You must know by now.
+2
→You must know by now.
+309
3 March 2013
3 December 2012
2 December 2012
→You must know by now.: fix unsigned, not really sure why it wasn't working though
-20
why are we hiding this section?
-43
1 December 2012
space
m-1
→You must know by now.: looks like no new arguments are forthcoming and discussion is going in circles
+114
Undo revision 1061593 by Lord Eydvar (talk)
+432
29 November 2012
1 November 2012
→You must know by now.: unsigned, reply
+445
→You must know by now.
+195
→You must know by now.: Reply; unsigned.
+891
31 October 2012
28 October 2012
There clearly is a reference in the article. If you have an honest concern, try to articulate it clearly, this is no forum. - Undo revision 1046944 by 98.150.207.251 (talk)
-35
→You must know by now.
+35